Illustration: embedded systems and industrial automation

Your line is down.
Critical component is EOL. OEM recommends replacement.

Every day of downtime hits output, budget, and management reporting. We reconstruct the technical root cause, document options, and deliver a defensible retrofit decision — instead of a blanket replacement request.

Modernize instead of replacing — on your existing equipment.

Founded in Austria · Ing. Mag. Patrick Eiler, Founder — Team →

Uptime Retrofit—not replacement Documented decision basis

When the line is down, every hour counts

Maintenance and production own the outcome — not only the technology, but also budget, supplier choice, and the question from management: why is the machine still down?

Line down

Downtime, lost output, management escalation — and you need to explain why the machine is still down and which path makes sense.

EOL with no spare path

Critical chip or controller discontinued, no spares, missing source code or protocol docs — the technical bottleneck blocks every fast decision.

OEM pushes full replacement

The vendor quote is for a new machine instead of a targeted retrofit — and pressure on budget approval and supplier choice keeps growing.

There is a defensible path.

We deliver root cause, documented options, and a retrofit decision you can stand behind internally.

Process. Projects. Evidence.

10+
Years experience
in certified products
TÜV process
Certification support
EMC pre-checks · documentation · lab iterations
RE & retrofit
Non-standard solutions
patent potential · protocol bridges · EOL PCB
8
Case studies
anonymized · symptom → outcome documented
DACH
Reference from practice
protocol RE · EOL PCB · firmware security
< 2 y
typical ROI
for suitable modernization cases

Anonymized references from practice

No marketing numbers without context: region, system type, technical challenge, and measurable outcome — linked to full case studies.

IND-008 EU · Condition monitoring / edge FFT

Sporadic failures on rotating equipment — no usable data basis for early warning during operation.

Edge-FFT diagnostic station as a retrofit path: trends, alarm history, and scalable rollout (see case study).

Case study IND-008 →
MFG-002 EU · Motor driver / PCB

EOL core chip, no spares, production at risk.

Drop-in PCB redesign after hardware RE — documented cost vs. downtime (see case study).

Case study MFG-002 →
AUTO-004 DACH · Field devices / firmware

Critical flaws in proprietary firmware, compliance requirement.

Security audit and hardening — documented reduction in unplanned outages (see case study).

Case study AUTO-004 →
PROTO-006 DACH · Foil punching machines at customer sites worldwide

Machine manufacturer, EOL drives in customer machines; lost source — protocol rebuilt via passive RE (sniffer, Ghidra).

STM32 intermediate controller in production, three axes on new inverters — machine software unchanged.

Case study PROTO-006 →
IOT-007 RU / EU · Smart water meter (ULP)

Class C, ≥12 year battery, radio swap without breaking seals — OEM needed STM32L4 ultra-low-power core and multi-radio exo-modules.

ULP core, CN injection mould, exo Wi‑Fi/NB‑IoT/LoRa/RS-232, BLE firmware and app advertising.

Case study IOT-007 →
SES-005 DACH · Production line (1996) / analog

No digital interfaces, high unplanned downtime — replacement only via full line swap.

78 points, ESP32 edge FFT, MQTT pipeline and dashboard — predictive maintenance without machine replacement.

Case study SES-005 →

Real results

PROTO-006 Manufacturing

EOL drives: protocol rebuilt, inverters retrofitted — software unchanged

Challenge: Field machines, EOL drives, lost source code — communication only recoverable from proprietary bus traffic.

Approach: Passive protocol RE (sniffer + Ghidra) → documented telegrams → STM32 intermediate controller → inverter retrofit.

Protocol REGhidraRS-422 snifferSTM32Servo retrofit
Full case study

Result

Machine software unchanged (retrofit path)
Protocol rebuilt from binary + bus traffic
STM32 intermediate controller in production
Inverters retrofitted instead of replacement
Retrofit

Retrofit path instead of replacement (case study PROTO-006)

Operators: line under pressure?

Downtime, EOL, or OEM replacement — we deliver root cause and a defensible retrofit decision.

For operators

OEM: keep your installed base supportable

Protocol gaps and lifecycle risks in the installed base — without customers switching to competitors.

For OEMs

No sales pitch. Just facts.

Reply within 24 hours No commitment Confidential